Nelsonfoto Forums
February 04, 2012, 11:51:32 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: ShopTalk Chat Room is Now On-Line
http://nelsonfoto.com/SMF/shoptalk/
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Anyone using Kodak GEM Professional grain-reduction software?  (Read 1022 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tom Hildreth
Prolific Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1687


View Profile WWW
« on: February 26, 2010, 01:55:13 PM »

I downloaded a trial version of this software, which I assume is about 10 years old in its original branding. It seemed to work as advertised. I have many grainy B&W negs, and after converting them to RGB post-scan, the default settings worked pretty much as advertised. Got some familiarity with other settings pretty quickly, too.  Tried it on some half-frame Kodachrome, which is pretty grainy, and it worked slick there also. I'm balking at the C-note price right now, but I might eventually go for it.

Anyone else tried it? Love it? Hate it? Don't care? Thrown it away?  Send me a registerable CD for cheap?
Logged
flatop222
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2010, 10:19:03 AM »

Hi Tom,

There is a version of GEM on my Nikon 4000 scanner, and as you found out, it works quite well on all types of film as long as you stay on the lower settings. On my scanner, when you go above 3 the grain gets a little mushy(sp?) and you begin to loose some detail. That is my personal limit. Your limit will probably differ.

However, there are some trial versions of noise reduction programs available that you might want to try. I am having a senior moment and cannot think of any but Noise Ninja. Google will probably come up with enough hits to keep you busy for awhile investigating them.

George
Logged
LarryD
Karma is Real
Prolific Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11203


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2010, 10:42:46 AM »

I don't have a grain problem with my scanning... I love the grain I get.. it is what I meant to get and I guess the way I scan lets me do it the way I want...  Smiley
Logged

Film photography and the Soviet Union are not dead. Just downsized.
Tom Hildreth
Prolific Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1687


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2010, 06:54:59 PM »

Thanks, flatop-I'll be looking.
OK Larry, I have you on the status board as a "Dont Care" (see flavors above).
Logged
LarryD
Karma is Real
Prolific Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11203


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2010, 07:24:32 PM »

LOL Tom... I don't care as it is me.
Logged

Film photography and the Soviet Union are not dead. Just downsized.
Tom Hildreth
Prolific Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1687


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2010, 01:37:51 PM »

Hah!  I was thinking it's natural for you to like the grain, Larry.  Without it, there's nothing for you to go against...
Logged
LarryD
Karma is Real
Prolific Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11203


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2010, 03:53:32 PM »

Against the grain is how to live life. Smiley
Logged

Film photography and the Soviet Union are not dead. Just downsized.
Tom Hildreth
Prolific Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1687


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2010, 07:23:53 AM »

So here's how it all came down. I bought the filter for $100 and waited for the CD to arrive. Contacted the seller who advised there was no CD, just a license to open up the trail version I had used. I then had to fight with Kodak for a month to get a CD with the filter on it, as I simply will not pay that kind of money for something that could be lost forever if I have a computer problem. At least I want a chance to restore the filter after I get any future computer problem straightened out, and I didn't feel this was likely with just a downloaded version.  The CD finally came, and I got lazy and simply filed the CD and have used the trail product with my licence much to my satisfaction a number of times now. Again, at least I have a chance of restoring the program with a CD on hand.

Here's a raw scan below, unedited and no Kodak GEM grain filter



And same scan but edited and GEM filter applied-very much more to my liking


Logged
Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3764


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2010, 09:53:51 AM »

The results look pretty good.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!